the enlightenment

I have been helping lead a community group this semester at UBC, in which we have been reading and discussing Brian McLaren's A New Kind of Christian. This has been a great group, and all of us have learned many things from the book and each other. As part of this book, we have been discussing the problems with doing faith and being Christians with a Modern mindset. As a result, we have critiqued many parts of modernity, but I want to make one thing clear. Modernity is not all bad. We wouldn't be reading computers, turning on lights, and doing a many other myriad of things without modernity.

Today my modern European philosophy professor was giving a side note about the Enlightenment before we started our discussion of Rousseau. One thing he said caught my ear: On September 11, my professor was eating lunch with a friend, who is also a professor at Baylor. They were discussing the tragedy from the morning, and my professor's friend remarked, "You know, the people who crashed the planes into the twin towers missed out on the Enlightenment."

One of the contributions of the Enlightenment was its emphasis on individual rights and autonomy. Sure, individualism developed as a result of these emphases, but something good did come out of them. Freedom of thought. Without this freedom, we would not have easy access to the Bible, the Quran, the Bhagavad-Gita, etc. We would not have easy access to books like Brian McLaren's A New Kind of Christian. We would not have the freedom to openly and publicly explore the edges of theology. We all value this freedom of thought, but I do not think we realize where it came from.

Bad things resulted from the Enlightenment and the modern period. However, many good things did as well. Let us not look past those good things. peace

Comments

Singleton said…
Anyone who would suggest that any single era/social movement/system of thought is THE ERA or THE MOVEMENT or THE THOUGHT is probably at least half wrong. I think it ties into something else we talked about in community group; metaphors. In a way, we could call all of these eras (and their accompanying systems of thought) metaphors (or stories). As soon as we say "Eureka! I've found it!" (whether the "it" is modernity, postmodernity or the stinking Dark Ages) we've missed the point. I think metaphors are necessary, but ultimately fail in getting the job done to perfection. A good read on this idea of thought systems as metaphors is a book by Neil Postman called "The End of Education." He takes on the daunting task of sorting the litany of metaphors out into failed metaphors and metaphors that "may serve." But, this is your blog Harris, not mine. And I am an a-hole for writing a comment this long. I am on my conference period and bored. Forgive me?
harris said…
you know i am patient. comments are not limited to length. check out some of the comments on carney's blog; those are long.
Mrs. Carn-Dog said…
Harry,

way to look at the other side of the moon.

carney

Popular Posts